Skip to content
HMS
Open menu

Hospital platform field atlas

Find the work. Follow its owner.

Start with what hospital teams need to accomplish, see where each record or decision stays accountable, and separate today's product from approved and longer-term direction.

Atlas index

Two lenses. One operating picture.

Use the catalog for product availability. Use the domain map for responsibility and handoffs.

35

Operating domains

5 connected wings
without shared ownership blur

31

Product capabilities

Current product,
approved direction and roadmap

Product catalog

Start with the work your teams need to do.

Compare what teams can use now with approved and longer-term direction. Open a brief to follow team actions, handoffs, safeguards, review evidence, connected product areas and the point where responsibility changes.

01

Choose a hospital task

02

Check its product status

03

Follow the handoffs

Catalog status describes the HMS product portfolio. A written facility scope defines the exact rollout, connected services, configuration and support.

Available product capabilities

Live now

18

Hospital and platform teams can use these capabilities today. A written facility scope still defines the exact rollout, connected services and support included.

Approved, decision pending

Upcoming

05

These programmes have approved product direction, but the final team experience, safeguards, ownership and delivery plan are still being decided. No public delivery date or completion promise is made.

Longer-term product direction

Coming soon

08

These named product areas describe a defined longer-term direction. Their final owner, team journeys and timing have not been approved.

Available product capabilities

Live now

Hospital and platform teams can use these capabilities today. A written facility scope still defines the exact rollout, connected services and support included.

Live · Current capability

Identity & account security

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · OperateSuper Admin · Govern

Accounts, invitations, sign-in assurance and sessions that help people enter HMS safely and keep access current.

Platform operatorsIdentity administratorsAuthenticated users
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Secure sign-in kept separate from account, role and session administration
  • People, roles, memberships and organisation units
  • Multi-factor authentication, passkeys, trusted devices and password security
  • Session validation, listing, revocation and lifecycle control
  • Tenant-user, platform-staff and invitation administration
  • Security events, login-risk analysis and governed overrides
  • Linked-user requests with target-person approval
How work moves
  1. An administrator creates or invites an account, assigns governed membership and follows the account through activation, suspension or closure.
  2. A user enrols an approved assurance method, establishes a session and can review or revoke trusted-device and session state.
  3. A linked-user request remains pending until the target user explicitly approves or rejects the relationship.
Safeguards
  • Tenant and platform-staff administration stay in separate policy boundaries, with lifecycle and session checks applied before use.
  • Login-risk and security overrides are governed operations rather than silent changes to account assurance.
  • Permission delegation is tenant-scoped and time-bounded; it is separate from linked-user approval and does not activate through that relationship.
What stays reviewable
  • Security-event and login-risk records retain the account, action, decision context and time of review.
  • Session, trusted-device, multi-factor authentication and passkey histories retain enrolment, validation and revocation state.
  • Invitation and linked-user request histories retain pending, accepted, rejected and expired outcomes.
Connected product areas
Auth
Secure sign-in handles entry credentials; Identity supplies account and assurance context without deciding hospital product access.
Permissions
Identity supplies authenticated subject and membership context; Permissions remains authoritative for product access.
Tenant
Identity consumes tenant lifecycle and scope without taking ownership of the hospital organisation.
Notifications
Identity requests invitation and security communication; Notifications owns delivery evidence.
Availability
  • Account and assurance controls plus Super Admin self-service are available; not every identity action appears in every team application.
  • Being signed in, linked to another user or given delegated access does not by itself authorize work in a hospital product area.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Secure sign-in, account, role, session and assurance foundations support every authenticated team surface.

  • Super AdminOperations

    Authenticated Super Admin users can use current account self-service for profile, password, multi-factor authentication, passkeys, trusted devices and session assurance.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Platform operators administer staff, tenant users, roles, invitations, sessions and security posture.

Where responsibility changes

Secure sign-in controls entry, Identity manages accounts and assurance, and Permissions decides product access; hospital records stay with their owning product areas.

Who this supports
  • Platform operators
  • Identity administrators
  • Authenticated users
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Identity service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Hospital organisation lifecycle

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · OperateSuper Admin · Govern

The platform lifecycle for each independently scoped hospital organisation and its operating configuration.

Platform operatorsTenant ownersProvisioning teams
23 brief points
What teams can do
  • Tenant creation, activation, suspension, closure and configuration governance
  • Organisation profile and initial-owner administration
  • Provisioning and closure-state coordination
  • Connection ownership and configuration boundaries
  • Purpose-limited internal tenant resolution and lookup
  • Platform portfolio and tenant-administration summaries
How work moves
  1. A platform operator records the organisation and initial owner, then follows provisioning to a terminal tenant state.
  2. Lifecycle changes coordinate suspension or closure while preserving the owning service’s record of what was requested and completed.
  3. Connected product areas receive only the organisation facts required for an approved purpose instead of reading the tenant’s full configuration.
Safeguards
  • Tenant identifiers and lifecycle transitions are explicit; a caller cannot infer or silently switch tenant scope.
  • Connection configuration has a named owner and remains separated from credentials or business data held by consuming services.
  • Each tenant is independent; no parent-child organisation or implicit cross-tenant operator scope is created.
What stays reviewable
  • Lifecycle and provisioning histories retain requested transitions, current state and terminal outcomes.
  • Organisation profile and ownership changes retain the tenant-scoped values used by downstream processes.
  • Closure and connection records preserve coordination state without becoming another service’s business ledger.
Connected product areas
Identity
Tenant supplies organisation and initial-owner context; Identity owns the account and membership lifecycle.
Facilities
Tenant establishes hospital scope; Facilities owns physical facilities, relationships and service structure.
Workflows
Tenant may start or signal named onboarding coordination while retaining tenant lifecycle authority.
Availability
  • Current tenant administration is a platform-operator boundary, not a tenant-wide group console.
  • Multi-facility wording never implies a parent tenant, cross-site patient record or automatic access between organisations.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Tenant resolution and lifecycle state establish the scope consumed by every tenant-owned service.

  • Super AdminOperations

    Platform operators create, provision, inspect and close independently scoped tenant organisations.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Ownership, profile, connection and lifecycle decisions are managed in the platform control plane.

Where responsibility changes

Tenant owns the platform organisation lifecycle. Facilities owns hospital structure; Identity and Permissions own people and access.

Who this supports
  • Platform operators
  • Tenant owners
  • Provisioning teams
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Tenant service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Access & purchased-feature governance

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · GovernTenant Admin · GovernCare · Embedded

Explainable access decisions across users, roles, resources, facilities and purchased features, with access denied whenever required information is missing.

Platform security teamsTenant access administratorsCare operators
27 brief points
What teams can do
  • Permission, feature and capability catalogue aggregation
  • User, role, platform, facility and resource-scoped assignments
  • Effective-access evaluation and current-subject decisions
  • Independent second-person approvals, conflict rules and grant history
  • Access-review campaigns and governed permission delegation
  • Constrained emergency patient access with expiry and review
  • Tenant and facility entitlements with numeric limits
  • Reviewed import, export, snapshots and bounded decision diagnostics
How work moves
  1. Catalogues are aggregated, an administrator proposes a scoped assignment, and sensitive changes move through approval and conflict checks before they can become effective.
  2. A protected action checks the person’s direct rules, role rules, inherited access, product availability and conflict constraints before allowing the work.
  3. A constrained emergency request can temporarily enable only patient read or urgent-note creation, then expires into mandatory review evidence.
Safeguards
  • Access is refused when required context, approval or product availability is missing; hiding an action in the interface never replaces the access decision.
  • Sensitive grants can require independent second-person approval, separation-of-duty checks, expiry and facility or resource scope.
  • Delegation is available only for published delegable definitions and remains tenant-scoped, target-scoped and time-bounded.
  • Emergency access is limited to patient reading and urgent-note creation; it is not an unrestricted emergency override.
What stays reviewable
  • Assignment, approval, denial, expiry and revocation histories preserve who changed access and why.
  • Each access decision explains why it was allowed or refused, while assignment, grant and activity histories remain separate review evidence.
  • Access-review, delegation, emergency-use, import and snapshot records support later reconciliation.
Connected product areas
Identity
Permissions evaluates authenticated subjects and memberships but does not issue tokens or manage sessions.
TenantBilling
Commercial state can produce desired entitlement intent; Permissions decides effective feature access.
Business service owners
Each service supplies resource and use-case context and enforces the returned decision at its own boundary.
Availability
  • Not every access-management action appears in every team workspace.
  • Emergency access, delegation, commercial entitlement and ordinary grants are distinct mechanisms with separate constraints.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Access decisions that deny access when required information is missing protect work even when an action is not visible in a team workspace.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Platform security teams govern catalogues, platform assignments, diagnostics and cross-tenant policy boundaries.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Tenant access administrators manage scoped assignments, approvals, delegation, conflicts and reviews.

  • Care WorkspaceEmbedded entry

    Care actions consume effective decisions and expose only bounded emergency-access acknowledgement where allowed.

Where responsibility changes

Permissions owns access and entitlement decisions. It does not own commercial prices, patient records or another service’s business lifecycle.

Who this supports
  • Platform security teams
  • Tenant access administrators
  • Care operators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Permissions service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Patient registry & identity matching

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · GovernCare · Operate

A governed patient identity lifecycle from first registration through correction, duplicate review and merge recovery.

Registration teamsHealth-information teamsTenant administrators
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Full and provisional patient registration
  • Privacy-safe patient search, demographics and profile lifecycle
  • Identifier definitions, attachment and verification evidence
  • Duplicate detection, data-quality queues and case review
  • Controlled merge, unmerge and identity reconstruction
  • Independent review and approval for birth-fact and high-risk identity corrections
  • Governed import, export, profile fields and registration artifacts
  • Purpose-specific patient details for connected product areas
How work moves
  1. Registration searches within tenant scope, selects an existing patient or creates a full or provisional record, then attaches governed identifiers and artifacts.
  2. Data-quality work identifies a possible duplicate, opens a review case and records a controlled merge or rejection with reconstruction support.
  3. High-risk demographic or birth-fact corrections move through independent review and approval rather than silently rewriting patient identity.
Safeguards
  • Search and purpose-specific patient details expose only the identity information needed and remain hospital-organisation scoped.
  • Identifier definitions, uniqueness, verification and lifecycle rules are governed rather than accepted as arbitrary strings.
  • Merge, unmerge and sensitive corrections use explicit cases, review states and reconstructable history.
What stays reviewable
  • Registration and identifier histories retain source, verification and lifecycle state.
  • Duplicate cases, merge graphs, unmerge outcomes and correction approvals preserve how identity changed.
  • Import, export and patient-card artifacts retain bounded generation and retrieval evidence.
Connected product areas
ClinicalCare, Scheduling, Inpatient and Billing
Patients supplies purpose-specific identity details; consuming product areas own their clinical, appointment, stay or account records.
Privacy
Privacy coordinates subject reconciliation and restrictions without becoming the patient registry.
ConsentAuthority
Patient identity anchors authority and consent evidence while ConsentAuthority owns policy and instruments.
Availability
  • The current patient registry and Care Workspace reach do not make Patients the owner of encounters, appointments, invoices or findings.
  • Search results remain privacy-safe and scoped to one hospital organisation; no group-wide or cross-organisation patient index is claimed.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    The patient registry supplies purpose-specific identity details without exposing records across hospital organisations.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Administrators govern identifier definitions, profile-field configuration and registration policy; Tenant Admin is not the general registry-operations surface.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    Registration teams search, register and review profiles, then perform operational data-quality, correction, import and export work in Care Workspace.

Where responsibility changes

Patients owns identity and reconciliation. Encounters, appointments, invoices and clinical findings remain with their service owners.

Who this supports
  • Registration teams
  • Health-information teams
  • Tenant administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Patients service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Provider directory & credentialing

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · Govern

Practitioner identity, qualifications, credentials, affiliations and clinical privilege decisions in one authority.

Credentialing teamsMedical administrationTenant administrators
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Practitioner directory, identifiers, roles and specialties
  • Qualifications and versioned credential definitions
  • Credential evidence custody and content scanning
  • Credentialing cases, review decisions and history
  • Facility affiliations, coverage and authority
  • Privilege definitions, grants, reviews and expiry
  • Booking and template-authority decisions for Scheduling
  • Provider catalogue governance and protected imports
How work moves
  1. A practitioner record is established, identifiers and qualifications are attached, and credential evidence enters a reviewable credentialing case.
  2. Reviewers record decisions and expiry, then grant facility-specific affiliations or clinical privileges with later renewal and review.
  3. Scheduling asks Providers whether a practitioner has the authority required for a bookable service or template.
Safeguards
  • Credential and privilege definitions are versioned and tenant-scoped, with explicit review and expiry behavior.
  • Uploaded evidence passes protected custody and content-scanning boundaries before review.
  • Facility affiliation, booking authority and clinical privilege are separate decisions rather than one broad provider-active flag.
What stays reviewable
  • Credential artifacts, definition versions, case reviews and decisions retain the basis for current status.
  • Affiliation, coverage, privilege grant, review, expiry and renewal histories remain reconstructable.
  • Protected imports and catalogue changes retain validation and processing outcomes.
Connected product areas
Scheduling
Providers answers booking and template-authority questions; Scheduling owns appointments and availability.
Facilities
Providers references facility identity for affiliations and privileges; Facilities owns the estate and service structure.
ClinicalCare
Purpose-specific practitioner details identify care participants without transferring credential authority to the clinical record.
Availability
  • Available credentialing and Tenant Admin capabilities do not include employment, payroll or workforce scheduling.
  • A directory entry alone does not prove a current credential, affiliation, privilege or booking authority.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Purpose-specific practitioner details support scheduling and clinical work while Providers keeps authority over credentials and privileges.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Credentialing teams manage practitioners, evidence, cases, affiliations, privileges and renewals.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Administrators govern credential definitions, privilege catalogues and protected imports.

Where responsibility changes

Providers owns practitioner authority and clinical privilege. Employment, payroll and appointment state stay outside this service.

Who this supports
  • Credentialing teams
  • Medical administration
  • Tenant administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Live · Current capability

Facilities & service estate

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · GovernCare · Embedded

Hospital relationships, physical structure, service offerings, equipment, partners, schedules and readiness with facility-scoped ownership.

Hospital administratorsFacility operationsHospital setup teams
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Facilities, facility relationships and physical hierarchy
  • Wards, rooms, beds and structural lookup
  • Facility types, reference catalogues and governance profiles
  • Clinical service offerings and delivery configuration
  • Equipment, external partners and capability evidence
  • Readiness snapshots, setup plans and reusable templates
  • Facility schedules and owner decisions
  • Protected evidence, content scanning and data imports
How work moves
  1. An administrator establishes a facility and its relationships, then builds the physical structure from wards through rooms and beds.
  2. Service offerings, equipment, partners and schedules are configured and assessed through readiness snapshots and setup plans.
  3. Protected evidence and imports pass validation and scanning before becoming part of facility capability records.
Safeguards
  • Every structural and capability record remains tenant- and facility-scoped with explicit relationship rules.
  • Reference catalogues, service configuration and reusable templates are governed separately from operational reservations.
  • Evidence uploads and imports use protected processing and validation rather than direct unreviewed attachment.
What stays reviewable
  • Facility relationship and physical-structure histories retain the estate used by downstream services.
  • Readiness snapshots, setup plans, equipment records and capability evidence preserve assessed state and supporting artifacts.
  • Schedule, partner, service and import outcomes retain owner decisions and validation status.
Connected product areas
Inpatient
Facilities owns wards, rooms and beds; Inpatient owns holds, occupancy and patient location history.
Scheduling
Facilities supplies services, locations and facility schedules; Scheduling owns bookable commitments and queues.
Providers
Facilities supplies facility identity and service context; Providers owns affiliations and privileges.
Availability
  • Identity—not Facilities—owns organisation units used for identity membership and administration.
  • A configured bed, service, partner or piece of equipment does not prove occupancy, appointment availability, stock or external readiness.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Facility, structure, service and readiness facts are supplied to scoped operational services.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Facility teams maintain physical structure, relationships, services, equipment, partners and setup progress.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Administrators govern facility types, profiles, schedules, templates, evidence and reference catalogues.

  • Care WorkspaceEmbedded entry

    Care Workspace exposes bounded facility selection and operating context; it is not a Facilities administration console.

Where responsibility changes

Facilities owns relationships, physical structure and capability truth. Scheduling owns reservations; Inpatient owns occupancy; Inventory would own stock.

Who this supports
  • Hospital administrators
  • Facility operations
  • Hospital setup teams
Technical ownership evidence

Live · Current capability

Scheduling, queues & recovery

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · GovernCare · Operate

Channel-aware availability, appointments, walk-ins, waitlists and service-point operations with downtime recovery.

Front deskScheduling teamsTenant administrators
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Bookable services and facility/provider authority requirements
  • Schedules, exceptions, availability and durable slot holds
  • Appointment requests, booking, rescheduling and cancellation
  • Recurring series, group sessions and coordinated appointments
  • Walk-ins, arrivals, waitlists, offers, queues and tokens
  • Booking, queue and forecasting-policy governance
  • Operational periods, incidents, timing offers and recovery plans
  • Downtime reconciliation, reports and governed imports
How work moves
  1. An administrator configures a bookable service, authority requirements, schedules and exceptions before availability can be offered.
  2. An operator or approved channel holds a slot, commits or changes an appointment, then manages arrival, queue and completion state.
  3. Waitlist offers, operational incidents and downtime work move through bounded timing, expiry and reconciliation paths.
Safeguards
  • Durable holds and conflict checks protect capacity from double commitment under concurrent booking.
  • Facility, provider authority, channel, recurrence, queue and forecasting policies constrain each operation.
  • Downtime recovery and imports reconcile bounded records instead of silently overwriting current commitments.
What stays reviewable
  • Appointment, request, hold, recurrence and cancellation histories retain state transitions and actors.
  • Queue tokens, arrivals, waitlist offers and timing records preserve service-point chronology.
  • Operational incidents, recovery plans, reconciliation reports and import outcomes retain interrupted-work evidence.
Connected product areas
Patients
Scheduling uses purpose-limited patient identity while Patients remains responsible for the patient registry.
Providers and Facilities
Scheduling checks practitioner authority and facility/service context before offering capacity.
Notifications
Scheduling requests channel-safe reminders and updates; Notifications owns delivery and receipts.
ClinicalCare
Scheduling owns the commitment and arrival; ClinicalCare owns the encounter and clinical record.
Availability
  • Public channels cannot create availability or commitments outside Scheduling or bypass practitioner and facility checks.
  • Availability, appointment, queue and clinical encounter states remain separate even when presented in one operator journey.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Scheduling owns availability, holds, commitments, queues and reconciliation behind all booking channels.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Administrators configure services, schedules, policies, templates, queue behavior and recovery rules.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    Front-desk teams search availability, book and manage appointments, arrivals, walk-ins, waitlists and queues.

Where responsibility changes

Scheduling owns commitments, holds and queues. It does not own the clinical encounter, patient identity or public-channel assurance.

Who this supports
  • Front desk
  • Scheduling teams
  • Tenant administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Scheduling service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Clinical care & longitudinal record

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · GovernCare · Read

Encounter-centred clinical records, care coordination, forms and purpose-specific patient, practitioner and facility details, with governed correction paths.

CliniciansCare coordinatorsClinical-governance teams
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Encounter and episode lifecycle
  • Allergies, diagnoses, problems and observations
  • Clinical notes, prescriptions and medication-administration facts
  • Clinical order intent and review context
  • Care plans, tasks, handoffs and immunisation coordination
  • Versioned clinical forms, responses and review governance
  • Clinical documents, imports and data-quality correction
  • Patient, practitioner and facility reference information
How work moves
  1. A care team opens an encounter or episode and records clinical facts, notes, forms, tasks and care coordination under the responsible clinical owner.
  2. Corrections and data-quality work retain the original context while producing an explicit reviewed clinical state.
  3. Care Workspace users can inspect timeline, task and handoff information; this does not mean every displayed record can be changed there.
Safeguards
  • Clinical changes require tenant, patient, encounter, author and use-case context plus the matching access decision.
  • Forms and clinical definitions are versioned so a response remains tied to the structure used when it was recorded.
  • Copied patient, practitioner and facility details are limited to the clinical purpose and do not transfer responsibility for those records to ClinicalCare.
What stays reviewable
  • Encounter, episode, note, diagnosis, observation, task, handoff and form histories retain clinical chronology.
  • Document, import, review and correction records preserve source, version and disposition evidence.
  • Context checks show when patient, practitioner or facility details are stale or missing.
Connected product areas
Patients, Providers and Facilities
ClinicalCare uses purpose-specific patient, practitioner and facility details while those product areas remain responsible for identity.
Scheduling
Scheduling supplies appointment and arrival context; ClinicalCare owns encounter and treatment facts.
Future diagnostic and pharmacy domains
Clinical order intent is current; execution, verified results and dispensing remain separate future ownership decisions.
Availability
  • Care Workspace currently shows timeline, task and handoff information; other clinical cards do not imply that every record can be changed there.
  • Laboratory and Radiology execution ownership relative to ClinicalCare order intent remains unresolved for the future programmes.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Encounter records and purpose-limited patient, provider and facility context support clinical work.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Administrative surfaces govern forms, specialty definitions and clinical configuration boundaries.

  • Care WorkspaceRead-only

    Care Workspace currently shows the patient timeline, tasks and handoffs; the other visible cards are informational only.

Where responsibility changes

ClinicalCare owns encounter intent and clinical context. Diagnostic execution, dispensing, occupancy and patient identity retain separate owners.

Who this supports
  • Clinicians
  • Care coordinators
  • Clinical-governance teams
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: ClinicalCare service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Inpatient admissions, transfers & occupancy

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · ReadCare · ReadCare · Operate

Admission, stay, occupancy, transfer, leave, discharge and mortuary custody with facility-scoped reconciliation.

Bed managersInpatient operatorsHospital administrators
27 brief points
What teams can do
  • Admission requests and admission decisions
  • Inpatient stays and location history
  • Bed holds, occupancy and overlapping-stay protection
  • Transfer requests and completed movements
  • Patient leave and return lifecycle
  • Discharge planning and physical-discharge execution
  • Census snapshots, rebuild and reconciliation
  • Death reports, mortuary custody and governed imports
How work moves
  1. An approved admission becomes a stay, bed occupancy is protected, transfers and leave are recorded, and discharge completes through explicit states.
  2. Census snapshots are rebuilt or reconciled against stay and location truth rather than edited as an independent census ledger.
  3. Death reporting and mortuary custody follow a distinct traceable path without moving clinical-cause ownership into Inpatient.
Safeguards
  • Overlapping-stay and occupancy protection prevent one bed or patient from entering incompatible active states.
  • Admission, transfer and discharge changes require valid current state, hospital organisation, facility, location and person context.
  • Starting or completing census reconciliation requires its dedicated access decision; seeing the stays page is not enough.
  • Rebuild, reconciliation and imports are bounded recovery operations with explicit outcomes.
What stays reviewable
  • Admission, stay, bed hold, occupancy, location, transfer, leave and discharge histories retain chronological state.
  • Census snapshots, rebuild runs, reconciliation differences and import outcomes preserve operational evidence.
  • Death reports and mortuary custody records retain each handoff without becoming the clinical record.
Connected product areas
Facilities
Facilities owns wards, rooms and beds; Inpatient owns their patient occupancy and location history.
ClinicalCare
ClinicalCare owns assessments and treatment facts; Inpatient owns admission, transfer, discharge and physical disposition.
Patients
Inpatient consumes patient identity snapshots while Patients remains the registry authority.
Availability
  • Tenant Admin is information-only, and Care Workspace does not currently support admission, bed, transfer, leave, discharge or mortuary actions.
  • Census reconciliation requires its own access decision; the current stays page does not by itself establish that authority.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Admission, occupancy, census and mortuary foundations keep inpatient state transitions consistent.

  • Tenant AdminRead-only

    Tenant Admin currently provides information only; admission, transfer and discharge settings cannot be changed there.

  • Care WorkspaceRead-only

    Care Workspace currently shows inpatient stays and patient locations.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    Care Workspace also supports census review; its other admission, transfer and discharge cards are informational only.

Where responsibility changes

Inpatient owns the stay and location lifecycle. Facilities owns physical structure; ClinicalCare owns clinical assessments and treatment facts.

Who this supports
  • Bed managers
  • Inpatient operators
  • Hospital administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Live · Current capability

Privacy & patient data rights

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · GovernCare · Embedded

Patient data-rights operations, restrictions, legal holds and subject reconciliation with protected evidence packages.

Privacy teamsHealth-information teamsPatient-service staff
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Data-rights request intake, queue and case lifecycle
  • Request-category decisions and owner coordination
  • Protected package publication and download
  • Disclosure evidence and governed completion
  • Privacy restrictions and legal holds
  • Patient-subject reconciliation and exception recovery
  • Purpose-specific scheduling and product-area details
  • Operator work summaries and exception visibility
How work moves
  1. A request enters intake, is categorised and reconciled to the correct subject before data-owning services receive bounded work.
  2. Owners return allowed results, Privacy assembles a protected package, records disclosure and completes the case under review.
  3. Restrictions, legal holds and failed subject reconciliation remain visible for recovery or enforcement rather than being silently bypassed.
Safeguards
  • Subject matching, purpose, request category, tenant scope and current restriction or hold state constrain processing.
  • Data-owning services execute their own disposition; Privacy coordinates and verifies instead of directly rewriting owner records.
  • Published packages use protected access and bounded download evidence.
What stays reviewable
  • Request, queue, category, decision and owner-coordination histories retain case chronology.
  • Package publication, download and disclosure records preserve what was released and under which case.
  • Restriction, legal-hold, reconciliation, recovery and exception records support later review.
Connected product areas
Patients
Privacy reconciles a requester to patient identity while Patients remains the subject registry.
Data-owning services
Privacy sends bounded case work and receives evidence; each owner decides and performs allowed disposition.
AuditLogs and Reporting
Privacy coordinates protected evidence and oversight without treating audit or reporting copies as original records.
Availability
  • Tenant Admin is the current rights-case operating and governance surface; Care Workspace provides only bounded intake and enforcement context.
  • A completed Privacy case does not imply deletion or disclosure occurred in every owner unless that owner returned evidence.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Restrictions, holds, subject reconciliation and owner coordination protect service boundaries.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Privacy teams operate intake, queues, cases, packages, disclosure evidence, restrictions and reconciliation.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Tenant privacy teams govern request categories, owner coordination, restrictions, legal holds, disclosure evidence and completion policy.

  • Care WorkspaceEmbedded entry

    Care Workspace provides bounded data-rights intake and restriction-enforcement context; it is not a restriction-management or full Privacy console.

Where responsibility changes

Privacy owns rights cases and restrictions. Data-owning services still execute and evidence their own allowed disposition actions.

Who this supports
  • Privacy teams
  • Health-information teams
  • Patient-service staff
Technical ownership evidence

Live · Current capability

Patient billing & collections

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · GovernCare · Operate

Patient financial accounts, charges, invoices, collections and governed adjustments from estimate to settlement.

CashiersPatient-finance teamsBilling governance
27 brief points
What teams can do
  • Patient financial accounts and scoped access
  • Billable items, price books, charges and estimates
  • Invoices, sequences, credit notes and statements
  • Online checkout, verified payment-provider updates and reconciliation
  • Cashier drawers, sessions, tenders and deposits
  • Ledgers, balances, account credits and refunds
  • Payment plans, collection cases and recovery work
  • Write-off, refund approval and fiscal-document evidence
How work moves
  1. A patient account receives priced charges, can produce an estimate, then issues sequenced invoices, statements or credit notes.
  2. A cashier opens a drawer session, records tenders and deposits, and closes against account and ledger evidence.
  3. Online payment, refund, write-off, plan and collection work move through provider reconciliation and required approvals.
Safeguards
  • Patient-account access, tenant scope, fiscal sequence and current document state constrain financial operations.
  • Payment-provider updates are verified and reconciled; returning to the browser or receiving the same update twice does not settle an account by itself.
  • Refunds and write-offs can require explicit approval and retain separation from ordinary cashier collection.
What stays reviewable
  • Charges, invoices, credit notes, statements, receipts and fiscal artifacts retain sequence and lifecycle state.
  • Ledger entries, balances, tenders, drawer sessions, deposits and account credits preserve money movement.
  • Payment-provider update, reconciliation, refund, plan, collection and approval histories support recovery and review.
Connected product areas
Patients
PatientBilling references patient identity while owning the financial account and ledger.
Clinical and operational services
Clinical and operational product areas provide billable details; PatientBilling owns pricing, charges and invoices.
Payment providers
Payment providers send checkout and payment updates; responses are reconciled before account balances change.
Future Insurance
Insurance would own payer adjudication; PatientBilling retains patient-account balances and settlements.
Availability
  • Current patient billing does not claim payer adjudication, hospital general-ledger accounting or live payment-provider readiness.
  • Configured payment-provider connections and checkout support do not mean an active merchant account or a successful customer transaction exists.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Accounts, ledgers, invoices, verified payment-provider updates and reconciliation protect patient financial records.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Tenant finance teams operate patient accounts, charges, estimates, invoices, payments, plans, collections and recovery work.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Finance administrators govern billable items, price books, fiscal sequences, approvals and recovery policy.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    Cashiers and patient-finance teams operate estimates, invoices, drawers, tenders, payments and collections.

Where responsibility changes

PatientBilling owns patient-account money. It does not own payer claims, general-ledger accounting or tenant subscription billing.

Who this supports
  • Cashiers
  • Patient-finance teams
  • Billing governance
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: PatientBilling service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Tenant subscriptions & commercial billing

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · OperateSuper Admin · GovernTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · Govern

The commercial control plane for HMS products, prices, subscriptions, invoices, payments, refunds and recovery.

Platform financeTenant billing administratorsCommercial support
27 brief points
What teams can do
  • Seller and legal-entity setup
  • Products, prices and published commercial catalogue
  • Tenant billing accounts and profile governance
  • Subscription lifecycle and recurring authorisations
  • Checkout, payments, credits and refunds
  • Invoices, credit notes and fiscal sequences
  • Commercial documents, templates and artifacts
  • Failed-payment recovery, verified payment-provider updates and reconciliation
How work moves
  1. Platform finance publishes a product and price, establishes a tenant billing account and activates a governed subscription lifecycle.
  2. Checkout and recurring payment events reconcile into invoices, credits, refunds and commercial account state.
  3. Failed collection enters dunning and recovery while desired product-entitlement intent is coordinated separately from effective access.
Safeguards
  • Seller, legal entity, currency, product, price and fiscal-sequence state constrain commercial documents.
  • Payment-provider updates and recurring approvals are verified, safely de-duplicated and reconciled before commercial records change.
  • Commercial subscription state can request desired entitlement changes but cannot grant a user permission directly.
What stays reviewable
  • Catalogue, product, price, account and subscription histories retain published and effective commercial state.
  • Invoices, credit notes, payments, credits, refunds and fiscal artifacts preserve financial chronology.
  • Payment-provider update, reconciliation, failed-payment recovery and recurring-approval records support recovery and review.
Connected product areas
Tenant
TenantBilling references the customer organisation while Tenant remains authoritative for organisation lifecycle.
Permissions
TenantBilling produces desired feature-entitlement intent; Permissions evaluates and publishes effective access.
Payment providers
Payment providers exchange checkout and payment status; configured support does not mean a provider account is active.
Availability
  • An active or paid commercial subscription does not by itself provision effective access; Permissions remains authoritative.
  • Commercial billing supports these workflows, but this does not mean a public price list, active merchant account or customer deployment is available.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Commercial account, subscription, billing and provider reconciliation operate behind the product control plane.

  • Super AdminOperations

    Platform finance operates sellers, catalogues, tenant accounts, subscriptions, invoices, payments, refunds and dunning.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Platform operators govern products, prices, fiscal sequences, templates and commercial policy.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Tenant billing supports subscription changes, payment collection, invoice and document review, refund requests and cancellation.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Tenant administrators maintain billing profile and subscription choices without becoming the effective-access authority.

Where responsibility changes

TenantBilling charges an organisation for HMS. It is separate from patient accounts, payer claims and hospital general-ledger accounting.

Who this supports
  • Platform finance
  • Tenant billing administrators
  • Commercial support
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: TenantBilling service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Notifications & communication

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · OperateSuper Admin · Govern

Template-governed delivery, inbox, preferences, provider operations and evidence across approved communication channels.

Platform operatorsCommunication administratorsMessage recipients
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • User inbox, chronology and read state
  • Versioned templates, rendering and reusable content blocks
  • Email, SMS, push and WhatsApp provider configuration
  • Device registration and user preferences
  • Scheduled delivery, provider receipts and delivery status
  • Resend, replay and provider-feedback handling
  • Presence and real-time notification signals
  • Tenant policy, digest, rate-limit and provider diagnostics
How work moves
  1. An originating service requests an allowed message, Notifications selects a versioned template and approved channel, then schedules or delivers it.
  2. Delivery processing records provider acceptance, feedback and failures, safely tries failed sends again, and keeps inbox history and read state.
  3. Administrators diagnose providers, replay bounded work and govern templates, preferences, digests and rate limits.
Safeguards
  • The originating service decides whether communication is allowed; Notifications cannot invent business consent or purpose.
  • Tenant policy, user preference, channel, template version, rate limit and provider configuration constrain delivery.
  • Replay and resend are explicit operations tied to prior work and provider feedback, not unbounded duplicate sends.
What stays reviewable
  • Template versions, render inputs, scheduling state and message chronology retain what was prepared for delivery.
  • Provider receipts, feedback, delivery attempts, failures, repeat attempts and reprocessed-delivery records preserve delivery evidence.
  • Inbox read state, preferences, device registrations and presence signals retain user-channel state.
Connected product areas
Originating business service
The owner supplies the allowed event and bounded message data; Notifications owns rendering and delivery evidence.
Identity
Identity supplies recipient and account context without transferring account lifecycle to Notifications.
External channel providers
External channel providers send messages and return delivery receipts; configuration does not mean an account or sender is approved.
Availability
  • Configured provider connections and administration do not mean live provider accounts, approved sender identities, guaranteed delivery capacity or service levels.
  • A recorded provider acceptance or receipt is delivery evidence, not proof that a person read or acted on the message.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Schedules, provider connections, receipts and real-time updates support delivery behind the scenes.

  • Super AdminOperations

    Platform operators inspect delivery, provider feedback, replay and diagnostic state.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Communication administrators manage providers, templates, blocks, tenant policy, rate limits and channel configuration.

Where responsibility changes

Notifications owns rendering, delivery and evidence. The originating service decides whether a message is allowed and what business event it represents.

Who this supports
  • Platform operators
  • Communication administrators
  • Message recipients
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Notifications service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Audit evidence & legal hold

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · OperateSuper Admin · Govern

Append-oriented operational evidence for access, change, privileged action, export, retention and integrity review.

Security operationsAudit teamsPlatform governance
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Audit-event search, detail and entity-change history
  • Action, property, exception and actor evidence
  • Operational summaries and risk views
  • Prepared exports and protected download evidence
  • Legal holds and governed retention
  • Tamper-evident seal verification
  • Archive manifests and behind-the-scenes processing
  • Restoration requests and interrupted-work recovery
How work moves
  1. An authorised operator searches tenant-scoped events, follows entity changes and inspects actor, action, property and exception context.
  2. A protected export is prepared, retrieved through bounded download evidence and retained under applicable hold or retention policy.
  3. Archiving and restoration create inventories, verify seals and make interrupted work available for recovery.
Safeguards
  • Audit evidence is append-oriented, tenant-scoped and separately authorised from the business action it describes.
  • Legal hold and retention govern disposition; a routine archive cannot bypass an active hold.
  • Exports and restored evidence use protected preparation, bounded retrieval and integrity verification.
What stays reviewable
  • Events retain actor, action, entity, property changes, exception context and recorded time.
  • Prepared exports, protected downloads, legal holds and retention decisions preserve governance history.
  • Seal verification, archive inventories, restoration requests and recovery state retain integrity and processing evidence.
Connected product areas
All emitting services
Services emit bounded audit facts while retaining ownership of operational business state.
Reporting and security operations
Consumers query authorised evidence and summaries without turning AuditLogs into an operational database.
Protected artifact storage
Archive and export artifacts are referenced through governed manifests and retrieval evidence.
Availability
  • Audit search and governance complement, rather than replace, operational diagnostics, monitoring data and the records held by each product area.
  • A seal verifies retained evidence according to its mechanism; it is not a certification claim for the platform or facility.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Evidence intake, retention, archiving, seal checks and restoration preserve audit evidence separately from day-to-day records.

  • Super AdminOperations

    Security and audit operators search events, inspect changes, run exports, verify seals and recover interrupted work.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Platform governance manages legal holds, retention, archive and protected-export boundaries.

Where responsibility changes

AuditLogs owns durable review evidence and retrieval. It does not replace operational logs or become the authoritative business record.

Who this supports
  • Security operations
  • Audit teams
  • Platform governance
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: AuditLogs service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Clinical terminology & governed catalogues

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationSuper Admin · GovernTenant Admin · GovernCare · Read

Versioned code systems, value sets, mappings, units and tenant catalogues with licensed import and publication governance.

Terminology teamsClinical governanceCare users
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Terminology sources, scopes and licence agreements
  • Package intake, scanning, import checkpoints and validation
  • Code systems, concepts, designations and relationships
  • Value sets, expansion and replacement chains
  • Mappings, unit systems and conversions
  • Catalogue and tenant-local terminology governance
  • Review, publication, artifact and suspension lifecycle
  • Consumer dependency, usage policy and drift reconciliation
How work moves
  1. A terminology package enters intake, scanning, checkpointed import and validation before reviewers can publish an immutable version.
  2. Administrators build value sets, mappings, units and catalogues, then publish or suspend them under usage and licence policy.
  3. Care users perform read-only lookup while consumer dependencies and drift are reconciled by governance teams.
Safeguards
  • Source scope, licence agreement, package integrity and validation must be satisfied before publication.
  • Review, publication, replacement and suspension are explicit versioned states; consumers do not mutate published content.
  • Tenant-local catalogues and usage policies remain scoped and cannot silently override an incompatible shared version.
What stays reviewable
  • Source, licence, package, scan, checkpoint and validation histories retain import provenance.
  • Published artifacts, code-system versions, value-set expansions, mappings and suspension state retain semantic lineage.
  • Consumer dependencies, usage decisions and drift reconciliation preserve adoption evidence.
Connected product areas
Clinical and operational services
Terminology supplies published vocabulary and mappings; each service owns the facts recorded with those codes.
Workflows
A named terminology-source onboarding process may coordinate approved handoffs between product areas when enabled.
Protected artifact and integration boundaries
Protected packages and artifacts cross governed intake and publication boundaries.
Availability
  • Current Care Workspace reach is read-only lookup; publication, import, mapping and catalogue governance are administrative.
  • A supported terminology structure or import path does not prove a licence for a specific external vocabulary package.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Published versions, expansions, mappings and usage policy serve clinical and operational consumers.

  • Super AdminGovernance

    Platform terminology teams govern sources, licences, packages, publication and shared catalogues.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Tenant teams manage local catalogues, mappings, review, publication, suspension and consumer drift.

  • Care WorkspaceRead-only

    Care Workspace provides terminology lookup only; it does not expose import, mapping or publication operations.

Where responsibility changes

Terminology owns vocabulary and version evidence. Clinical and operational services retain ownership of facts recorded with those codes.

Who this supports
  • Terminology teams
  • Clinical governance
  • Care users
Technical ownership evidence

Live · Current capability

Reporting, analytics & governed evidence

Where teams work now

Foundation · FoundationReporting · OperateReporting · GovernTenant Admin · GovernTenant Admin · OperateCare · ReadCare · Operate

Governed report definitions, runs, protected report files, data-use rules and review evidence built from approved reporting data.

AnalystsHospital managersClinical and finance operators
30 brief points
What teams can do
  • Versioned report definitions, review and publication
  • Bounded execution, runs, lineage and freshness evidence
  • Protected artifacts, download, revocation and access history
  • Saved typed views, schedules and delivery evidence
  • Alerts, anomaly evaluation, annotations and approvals
  • Measures, formula lifecycle and semantic policies
  • Policy-constrained natural-language-to-typed-query preview
  • Benchmarks, owner reconciliation and privacy or restore gates
How work moves
  1. An author versions a report definition, completes review and publication, then runs it against approved reporting data.
  2. Runs retain data origin and freshness, produce protected report files and can be scheduled, delivered, downloaded or revoked with access evidence.
  3. A natural-language phrase can preview a report based on published measures for the preceding 30 days; users must confirm the preview, and confirmation does not run the report.
  4. Alerts and data checks move through annotations and approvals while data freshness and privacy gates remain visible.
Safeguards
  • Standard reports require reporting access; patient-level reports require additional patient-level reporting access, and the responsible product area must still allow the data to be used.
  • Natural-language preview is limited to published measures and cannot run unrestricted reports; confirmation does not start a report.
  • Artifacts use protected access, revocation and download history, and privacy or restore gates can stop delivery.
What stays reviewable
  • Definition versions, reviews, publication, run parameters, lineage and freshness retain how a result was produced.
  • Artifacts, downloads, revocations, schedules and delivery records preserve distribution history.
  • Alert, anomaly, annotation, approval, benchmark, reconciliation and privacy-gate records retain analytic decisions.
Connected product areas
Product areas supplying report data
Reporting uses purpose-built report data; each product area remains responsible for its day-to-day records.
Privacy
Privacy restrictions and restore gates can block or qualify artifacts without moving case ownership into Reporting.
Notifications
Reporting requests scheduled delivery and alerts; Notifications owns channel delivery evidence.
Availability
  • Natural-language preview follows fixed matching rules rather than AI. When a phrase matches more than one measure equally well, the preview may vary; confirmation is saved but does not run a report.
  • Available reporting does not guarantee that every data feed is current, every report is published or every recipient has access.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Report preparation, scheduling, alerts and data checks operate behind governed reporting.

  • Reporting WorkspaceOperations

    The authenticated Reporting Workspace exposes governed definitions, runs, report files, views, schedules, alerts and analysis; ordinary runs use standard reporting access.

  • Reporting WorkspaceGovernance

    Reporting operators review publication, measures, formulas, semantic policy, benchmarks and protected access.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Tenant reporting governance creates and publishes definitions, measures and policies under review controls.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Tenant reporting operations inspect reconciliation and restoration state without replacing the records held by each product area.

  • Care WorkspaceRead-only

    Care surfaces read bounded patient-report definitions, lineage and authorized result summaries.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    A Care Workspace action starts a patient-scoped report only with additional patient-level reporting access and remains bounded to the preceding 30 days.

Where responsibility changes

Reporting owns report-ready data, definitions and files. Each product area remains responsible for its operational records, and natural-language input cannot bypass approved report rules.

Who this supports
  • Analysts
  • Hospital managers
  • Clinical and finance operators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Reporting service family

Related atlas domains

Live · Current capability

Reliable process coordination

Where teams work now

Foundation · Foundation

Keeps three approved behind-the-scenes processes moving when a step must wait for completion or a deadline, while the responsible product area retains every record and decision.

Hospital setup teamsTerminology governance teamsConsent governance teams
22 brief points
What teams can do
  • Initial-owner onboarding can wait for completion or expiry and return a clear outcome to tenant administration
  • Terminology-source onboarding can coordinate the approved handoff into terminology governance
  • Consent-policy review can wait for the responsible review decision and return its outcome
  • The responsible product area remains authoritative for every business record and decision
  • Waiting, completion and interruption remain distinguishable during a long-running handoff
  • Only the three named processes are part of the current product capability
How work moves
  1. Initial-owner onboarding waits for the owning tenant process to complete or expire, then hands the outcome back without becoming the organisation record.
  2. Terminology-source onboarding coordinates its approved handoff while Terminology keeps the source record, review state and publication decisions.
  3. Consent-policy review coordinates the requested review while ConsentAuthority keeps the policy, evidence and final decision.
Safeguards
  • Only initial-owner onboarding, terminology-source onboarding and consent-policy review are supported; arbitrary cross-product automation is not accepted.
  • Each responsible product area validates its own action and completion state, so coordination cannot silently replace an owner decision.
  • A named process is available only where its coordination has been enabled; its presence in this catalog does not prove activation in a deployment.
What stays reviewable
  • Coordination retains whether a request is waiting, completed, expired or incomplete, together with the returned outcome.
  • The responsible product area retains the business result and final decision used to complete the handoff.
  • An interrupted or unsuccessful handoff remains distinguishable from a completed owner decision for later review.
Connected product areas
Tenant
Initial-owner onboarding can be coordinated, while Tenant keeps the organisation, owner and onboarding record.
Terminology
Terminology-source onboarding can be coordinated, while Terminology keeps source intake, review and publication decisions.
ConsentAuthority
Consent-policy review can be coordinated, while ConsentAuthority keeps policy state, evidence and the review decision.
Availability
  • Only initial-owner onboarding, terminology-source onboarding and consent-policy review are available today, and only where enabled.
  • HMS does not currently let customers create their own automated workflows or rules, and it provides no workflow builder, rules engine or workflow administration console.
  • The responsible product areas retain their records and decisions; coordination never becomes a general clinical-pathway or business-record owner.
Where teams work now

Current product reach. Each label distinguishes hands-on work, governance, reading, an embedded step or a behind-the-scenes foundation.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Available only as behind-the-scenes coordination for the three named processes; there is no team workspace for it.

Where responsibility changes

Reliable process coordination keeps three named handoffs moving. It never becomes the record owner and is not customer-defined workflow automation.

Who this supports
  • Hospital setup teams
  • Terminology governance teams
  • Consent governance teams
Technical ownership evidence

Approved, decision pending

Upcoming

These programmes have approved product direction, but the final team experience, safeguards, ownership and delivery plan are still being decided. No public delivery date or completion promise is made.

Upcoming · Approved direction, decisions pending

Security incident & data-breach response

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

A decision-pending programme intended to help authorised platform and hospital teams recognise, contain, assess and review a security incident or potential personal-data breach without crossing service or tenant boundaries.

Platform security and operations teamsTenant privacy and administrative contactsQualified incident reviewers
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Bring related security signals into one reviewed case without treating every alert as an incident
  • Declare and classify an incident with accountable ownership and reviewed severity
  • Coordinate owner-executed containment while preserving investigation evidence
  • Assess possible personal-data involvement and notification duties against approved policy
  • Keep an affected tenant informed through bounded status and acknowledgement
  • Complete post-incident review, tracked remediation and readiness drills
How work moves
  1. Related signals would be reviewed and correlated before an authorised person or approved rule could declare an incident; a signal alone would never become a case automatically by implication.
  2. A declared case would move through classification, reviewed severity, evidence preservation and owner-executed containment without writing directly into another product area.
  3. Possible personal-data involvement would open a qualified notification assessment whose decision and basis stay reviewable; it would not be recorded as a lawful disclosure.
  4. An affected tenant could receive approved information and acknowledge it before the case proceeds to review, remediation and closure.
Safeguards
  • Signal, incident, personal-data breach, lawful disclosure and authorised emergency access would remain separate concepts with separate decisions.
  • Every containment request would go through the responsible product area’s authorised path and require its returned result before success could be shown.
  • Tenant participants would be limited to their own approved incident information and acknowledgement; they could not see another tenant or issue platform containment commands.
  • Cross-tenant exposure would remain the highest-risk default and could be downgraded only through an explicit reviewed decision with evidence.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes the earliest detection time, correlated signals, declaration, classification, severity decisions and accountable case timeline.
  • Owner-returned containment results, preservation acknowledgements and protected evidence references would remain traceable without copying affected content into the case.
  • Notification assessments, approved dispatch outcomes, tenant acknowledgement, review findings, remediation and drill results would retain their decision basis.
Connected product areas
Platform security and operations
The programme would own incident command and cross-owner coordination, subject to final ownership approval.
Identity, Permissions and data-owning product areas
Each owner would execute and evidence its own containment action rather than accepting a direct cross-service write.
Privacy and Notifications
Privacy would supply approved subject and policy context, while Notifications would deliver approved communications and return delivery evidence.
Affected tenant
The tenant’s authorised contact would receive only bounded information for that tenant and could acknowledge it without taking platform command.
Availability
  • Decision pending: Product direction is approved, but the operating model, access rules and delivery design are not yet final.
  • No incident case management, severity model, containment process, notification process or drill capability is available today.
  • Ownership, authority, notification handoffs and review evidence still require approval.
  • No legal deadline, response time, containment result, certification or compliance outcome is promised by this catalog entry.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Responsibilities are outlined, but no application placement, operator route or tenant route is approved. Any future team experience still requires final design and access approval.

Where responsibility changes

This capability would coordinate incident decisions and evidence across product areas. Each area would carry out its own containment and retain its records; each hospital would see only its approved incident information.

Who this supports
  • Platform security and operations teams
  • Tenant privacy and administrative contacts
  • Qualified incident reviewers
Technical ownership evidence

Upcoming · Approved direction, decisions pending

National interoperability

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · GovernCare · Embedded

A proposed national exchange boundary for practitioner and facility registries, patient identity linkage, consent-aware records and claims transport.

Hospital registry administratorsIntegration teamsCare operators
24 brief points
What teams can do
  • Practitioner-registry registration and verification
  • Facility-registry registration and verification
  • Patient identity verification and governed linkage
  • Consent-artifact and clinical-bundle exchange
  • Claims-transport coordination with the future Insurance owner
  • Specification, sandbox and certification-evidence management
How work moves
  1. Intended registry onboarding would submit practitioner or facility facts, retain external responses and reconcile verification state with the source owner.
  2. Intended patient exchange would verify identity and authority, assemble a consent-bounded clinical package and record the remote outcome.
  3. Claims transport would be coordinated with the future Insurance boundary rather than making interoperability the payer-adjudication owner.
Safeguards
  • The proposed design requires tenant, facility, subject, purpose, consent and specification-version checks before exchange.
  • External identifiers and responses would be reconciled to Providers, Facilities or Patients instead of replacing their source records.
  • Sandbox or certification evidence would remain environment- and specification-specific; it could not be marketed as universal approval.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes submission versions, external correlation, acknowledgement, rejection and reconciliation history.
  • Identity-linkage and consent decisions would retain the subject, authority, purpose and artifact version used for an exchange.
  • Specification, sandbox and certification artifacts would retain their exact programme and environment scope.
Connected product areas
Providers and Facilities
Registry connections would exchange verified practitioner and facility information without taking responsibility away from Providers or Facilities.
Patients and ConsentAuthority
Patient linkage and clinical exchange would require source identity and effective authority or consent.
Future Insurance
Claims transport may be shared, while the future Insurance service would own payer workflow and adjudication.
Availability
  • Decision pending: Public direction is approved, but the operating model and delivery design are not yet final.
  • No national gateway, registry, sandbox, certification, external identifier or production exchange is claimed as connected or approved.
  • The intended operator surfaces are Tenant Admin plus bounded Care Workspace entry—not Super Admin.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Proposed registry connections, identity checks and reconciliation would remain behind the scenes.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Intended registry onboarding, verification, consent and exchange administration belongs in Tenant Admin.

  • Care WorkspaceEmbedded entry

    A bounded intended identity or exchange step may appear inside care work; no full interoperability console is proposed here.

Where responsibility changes

The programme would exchange governed facts and evidence. Each product area remains responsible for its records, and no regulatory approval or universal mandate is claimed.

Who this supports
  • Hospital registry administrators
  • Integration teams
  • Care operators
Technical ownership evidence

Upcoming · Approved direction, decisions pending

Insurance, payers & claims

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · FoundationCare · OperateTenant Admin · Govern

A proposed payer lifecycle from policy and eligibility through pre-authorisation, claim, query, denial, appeal and settlement.

Insurance desksRevenue-cycle teamsCashless-care operators
26 brief points
What teams can do
  • Payer, policy and coverage administration
  • Eligibility checks and response evidence
  • Cashless pre-authorisation lifecycle
  • Claim preparation, submission and status
  • Queries, denials, appeals and supporting evidence
  • Settlement reconciliation to PatientBilling
  • Evidence-selected national gateway, direct payer connections or both
How work moves
  1. The intended flow would establish coverage, request eligibility and pre-authorisation, then prepare and submit a claim with supporting evidence.
  2. Queries, additional evidence, denial and appeal would remain explicit payer-case states before settlement is reconciled to patient finance.
  3. The connection approach would be selected from evidence for a national gateway, direct payer connections or both; no approach has been chosen.
Safeguards
  • The proposed lifecycle requires tenant, patient, policy, payer, encounter, authorisation and document-scope validation.
  • Every external response would be matched to its case, safely de-duplicated and reconciled before changing payer-case state.
  • PatientBilling settlement cannot be inferred from claim submission or payer status alone.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes coverage, eligibility, pre-authorisation, claim version, submission and external-response histories.
  • Query, denial, appeal and supporting-document chains would retain every request and disposition.
  • Settlement reconciliation would retain payer remittance and the bounded PatientBilling entries it affects.
Connected product areas
PatientBilling
Insurance would supply adjudication and settlement outcomes; PatientBilling would retain patient-account money.
Clinical, Patient and Provider owners
Claims would consume purpose-limited source facts and documents without becoming their record owner.
National gateway or payer connections
The transport choice remains open and must be selected from evidence rather than assumed in public copy.
Availability
  • Decision pending: Public direction is approved, but the operating model and delivery design are not yet final.
  • No payer, national gateway, live eligibility check, response-time commitment, cashless network or live claim submission is connected or promised.
  • The primary transport path remains explicitly unselected.
  • Intended operations belong in Care Workspace, while Tenant Admin owns governance; no staff workspace is available today.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Proposed payer transport, reconciliation and response processing would remain bounded integration services.

  • Care WorkspaceOperations

    Intended insurance desks would operate policy, eligibility, pre-authorisation, claim, query, denial, appeal and settlement-reconciliation work in Care Workspace.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Intended payer, document, transport and escalation policy would be governed in Tenant Admin.

Where responsibility changes

Insurance would own payer adjudication, while PatientBilling remains the patient financial truth. No payer connectivity or response behavior is live.

Who this supports
  • Insurance desks
  • Revenue-cycle teams
  • Cashless-care operators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Programme CP-17 · decision pending

Related atlas domains

Upcoming · Approved direction, decisions pending

Quality, compliance & licensing

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · FoundationTenant Admin · OperateTenant Admin · Govern

A proposed establishment-level register for licences, inspections, filings, findings, corrective and preventive action, and quality indicators from approved evidence.

Quality teamsCompliance officersHospital leadership
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Licence and renewal register with expiry visibility
  • Inspection, finding and response evidence
  • Statutory filing calendar and accountable owners
  • Organisational incident-to-root-cause-to-corrective-action lifecycle
  • Quality indicators derived from owner events
  • Evidence packs for accreditation support
How work moves
  1. The intended licence and filing flow would assign an owner, track due and renewal state, attach reviewed evidence and surface unresolved expiry risk.
  2. An organisational quality/compliance incident or inspection finding would move through response, root-cause review, corrective action, verification and closure.
  3. Quality indicators would be calculated from approved product events and reporting data rather than entered as unsupported claims.
Safeguards
  • The proposed register requires establishment scope, accountable owner, due state, evidence version and reviewer separation.
  • Finding and corrective-action closure would require explicit verification rather than attachment upload alone.
  • Indicator definitions and data origin would be governed; Reporting would remain a dependency rather than the team-workspace owner.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes licence versions, renewals, filings, inspections, findings, responses and reviewer decisions.
  • Organisational incident, root-cause, corrective-action, verification and closure histories would preserve review chronology.
  • Indicator definitions, data origin and evidence-pack inventories would preserve how oversight material was assembled.
Connected product areas
Reporting
Reporting would supply governed data and files; Tenant Admin remains the intended team workspace.
Clinical and operational services
Source owners would provide bounded events and retain transaction-specific statutory records.
Protected artifact boundary
Protected artifacts would support review without constituting accreditation or certification by themselves.
Availability
  • Decision pending: Public direction is approved, but the operating model and delivery design are not yet final.
  • No facility licence, accreditation, inspection result, regulatory filing or certification is represented as current.
  • Tenant Admin is the intended governance and operations owner; Reporting supplies data and evidence but is not the team workspace.
  • Incident wording refers to organisational quality and compliance cases, not a complete clinical incident-management capability.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Approved evidence and indicator data would be collected from responsible product areas.

  • Tenant AdminOperations

    Intended quality and compliance teams would manage registers, inspections, findings, filings and corrective and preventive action in Tenant Admin.

  • Tenant AdminGovernance

    Intended indicator definitions, accountable owners, evidence requirements and review policy belong to Tenant Admin.

Where responsibility changes

The programme would support governed compliance evidence; it would not certify a facility or take transaction records from their source owners.

Who this supports
  • Quality teams
  • Compliance officers
  • Hospital leadership
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Programme CP-18 · decision pending

Related atlas domains

Upcoming · Approved direction, decisions pending

Public discovery & booking

Intended team surfaces

Discovery · OperateBooking · Operate

Two proposed public applications: anonymous healthcare discovery and tenant-bound booking with verified contact, abuse controls and Scheduling handoff.

Patients and representativesHospital publishing teamsFront-desk and scheduling teams
25 brief points
What teams can do
  • Tenant-published hospital, service and practitioner discovery
  • Explainable search and freshness-labelled public facts
  • Signed tenant, facility and service booking handoff
  • Approved contact check for guest booking
  • Secure manage-booking recovery
  • Direct-book, request and waitlist commitment clarity
  • Anti-enumeration, rate limiting and abuse review
  • Channel-safe Scheduling and Notifications integration
How work moves
  1. A hospital would publish selected facility, service and practitioner facts; Public Discovery would index them with source and freshness labels.
  2. A visitor would cross a signed tenant/facility/service handoff into Public Booking, complete approved assurance and request a Scheduling commitment.
  3. Manage-booking recovery, waitlist or request state and abuse review would remain within the public-channel boundary without exposing staff-only systems.
Safeguards
  • Public Discovery would contain no patient data and expose only explicitly published, freshness-labelled facts.
  • Public Booking would apply tenant binding, signed context, anti-enumeration, rate limits and approved contact assurance.
  • A public response would never bypass Scheduling authority, slot holds, patient matching or Notifications policy.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended discovery evidence includes publisher, source version, publication state, freshness and withdrawal history.
  • Intended booking evidence includes signed handoff, assurance outcome, request correlation and Scheduling response.
  • Recovery, rate-limit and abuse-review records would retain bounded channel-safety decisions.
Connected product areas
Tenant, Facilities and Providers
Discovery would consume explicitly published facts while each owner retains source truth.
Scheduling
Public Booking would submit bounded commands; Scheduling remains authoritative for holds, appointments and waitlists.
Patients and Notifications
Patient matching and channel delivery remain with their owners after approved public assurance.
Availability
  • Decision pending: Public direction is approved, but the operating model and delivery design are not yet final.
  • Neither public experience is available today.
  • Care Workspace is for staff, not public use; no public experience, one-time-passcode provider, published hospital catalogue or booking channel is live.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Public DiscoveryOperations

    An intended public discovery experience would search only hospital-published facts and hold no patient data.

  • Public BookingOperations

    A separate intended booking experience would confirm the requester and hand bounded booking requests to Scheduling.

Where responsibility changes

Public Discovery would never store patient data, and Public Booking would never become the source of Scheduling commitments or expose staff-only systems.

Who this supports
  • Patients and representatives
  • Hospital publishing teams
  • Front-desk and scheduling teams
Technical ownership evidence

Longer-term product direction

Coming soon

These named product areas describe a defined longer-term direction. Their final owner, team journeys and timing have not been approved.

Soon · Longer-term product area

Laboratory & pathology

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended specimen-to-result boundary for in-house, referral and hybrid laboratory operations.

Laboratory staffCliniciansDiagnostic administrators
18 brief points
What teams can do
  • Order intake and accessioning
  • Specimen collection, custody and rejection
  • Worklists, disciplines and analyser handoff
  • Quality-control and method evidence
  • Result review, verification and correction
  • Critical-value escalation
  • Referral-laboratory handoff and result return
How work moves
  1. Intended scope follows a specimen from accepted request through collection, custody, processing, review and verified result.
  2. Referral work would preserve outbound custody and returned-result reconciliation rather than treating an external report as local execution.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include specimen identity, custody, rejection, method, quality-control and reviewer separation.
  • Critical and corrected results would require explicit escalation and version history.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes accession, specimen custody, worklist, method and quality-control history.
  • Result versions, reviewer verification, correction and critical-value acknowledgement would remain traceable.
Connected product areas
ClinicalCare / future Laboratory
Order-intent ownership and the final handoff remain unresolved; no product owner has been selected.
Referral laboratories and analysers
External laboratory and analyser connections are intended only; no vendor or connection has been selected.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Laboratory and pathology.
  • Decisions are still open on order ownership, equipment connections, where laboratory teams would work and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no laboratory team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future Laboratory owner may own specimens and verified results, but its relationship to ClinicalCare order intent remains an open design decision.

Who this supports
  • Laboratory staff
  • Clinicians
  • Diagnostic administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Soon · Longer-term product area

Pharmacy & medication supply

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended medication-supply boundary separating prescribing intent, pharmacist review, dispensing and nursing administration.

PharmacistsCliniciansMedication-safety teams
18 brief points
What teams can do
  • Formulary and medication catalogue
  • Prescription intake and pharmacist review
  • Clarification and intervention workflow
  • Dispensing, returns and cancellation
  • Inpatient and outpatient pharmacy operations
  • Controlled-medicine evidence
  • Pharmacy stock and batch linkage
How work moves
  1. Intended scope moves a prescription through pharmacist review, clarification, dispensing, return or cancellation.
  2. Medication supply would link to batch and stock evidence while remaining separate from prescribing and administration facts.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include formulary status, pharmacist review, intervention, controlled-medicine handling and supply-state validation.
  • Dispensing would not alter the prescriber’s intent or create a nursing-administration fact.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes prescription review, clarification, intervention, dispensing, return and cancellation history.
  • Controlled-medicine, batch and stock linkage would retain traceability without preselecting the stock owner.
Connected product areas
ClinicalCare
ClinicalCare retains prescribing and administration facts; a future Pharmacy owner would govern review and supply.
Future Inventory
Pharmacy-versus-Inventory stock-ledger ownership remains unresolved and no handoff contract is approved.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Pharmacy and medication supply.
  • Decisions are still open on formulary ownership, controlled-medicine policy, stock ownership, where pharmacy teams would work and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no pharmacy team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future Pharmacy owner may govern review and supply; prescribing, administration and the future stock ledger remain separate ownership decisions.

Who this supports
  • Pharmacists
  • Clinicians
  • Medication-safety teams
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Roadmap product domain

Related atlas domains

Soon · Longer-term product area

Radiology & imaging

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended imaging-study lifecycle from accepted request and safety screening through acquisition, report verification and critical findings.

Radiology teamsReferring cliniciansImaging administrators
18 brief points
What teams can do
  • Imaging-request acceptance and protocol workflow
  • Modality worklists and acquisition status
  • Contrast and safety checks
  • Study, series and imaging-reference management
  • Structured reporting, review and verification
  • Critical-finding escalation
  • Imaging archives and equipment boundary
How work moves
  1. Intended scope moves an accepted imaging request through protocol, safety, worklist, acquisition and verified report.
  2. Critical findings and corrected reports would use explicit escalation and versioned acknowledgement.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include request acceptance, protocol, contrast and safety checks, acquisition identity and reviewer verification.
  • External image storage would be referenced through governed study identifiers rather than copied into an unbounded clinical record.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes protocol, safety, modality worklist, acquisition and study-reference history.
  • Report versions, reviewer verification, corrections and critical-finding acknowledgement would remain traceable.
Connected product areas
ClinicalCare / future Radiology
Imaging order-intent ownership and the final handoff contract remain unresolved.
Imaging archives and equipment
Image-storage and equipment connections are intended only; no product or vendor has been selected.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Radiology and imaging.
  • Decisions are still open on order ownership, medical-imaging data standards, equipment connections, where radiology teams would work and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no radiology team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future Radiology owner may own study execution and verified reports, but its relationship to ClinicalCare order intent remains open.

Who this supports
  • Radiology teams
  • Referring clinicians
  • Imaging administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Roadmap product domain

Related atlas domains

Soon · Longer-term product area

Inventory & procurement

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended traceable boundary for stock, batch, expiry, purchasing, movement and recall across hospital stores.

Stores teamsProcurementPharmacy and clinical operations
19 brief points
What teams can do
  • Item, store and stock-ledger ownership
  • Batch, serial, expiry and recall traceability
  • Purchase request and purchase-order lifecycle
  • Vendor, goods receipt and quality hold
  • Issue, transfer, return and consumption evidence
  • Cycle counts, adjustment and reconciliation
  • Implant and clinical-consumable linkage
How work moves
  1. Intended procurement scope moves a request through purchase order, vendor receipt, quality hold and available stock.
  2. Intended stock scope records issue, transfer, return, consumption, count, adjustment and recall with batch or serial traceability.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include store scope, item identity, batch or serial, expiry, quality state, reason and approval for adjustment.
  • Consumption linkage would identify why stock moved without turning Inventory into the clinical or financial record owner.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes purchase request, order, vendor, receipt, hold and release history.
  • Stock-ledger, transfer, return, count, adjustment, expiry and recall history would remain reconstructable.
Connected product areas
Facilities and clinical services
Facilities supplies location context and clinical owners supply consumption purpose; Inventory would own quantity and movement.
Future Pharmacy
Medication-stock ownership between Pharmacy and Inventory remains unresolved.
External accounting
General-ledger accounting remains outside the proposed stock and procurement boundary.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Inventory and procurement.
  • Decisions are still open on stock ownership, procurement policy, the pharmacy split, accounting connections, where teams would work and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no inventory or procurement team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future Inventory owner may own quantity and movement; clinical purpose, medication supply and general-ledger accounting remain separate.

Who this supports
  • Stores teams
  • Procurement
  • Pharmacy and clinical operations
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Roadmap product domain

Related atlas domains

Soon · Longer-term product area

Telehealth

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended remote-session boundary connected to scheduling and clinical care without treating a video provider as the clinical record.

PatientsCliniciansScheduling teams
19 brief points
What teams can do
  • Remote-appointment eligibility and policy
  • Video-session provisioning and secure join
  • Session lifecycle and participant evidence
  • Identity and representative checks
  • Teleconsult encounter handoff
  • Communication and failure recovery
  • Prescription-policy constraints
How work moves
  1. Intended scope checks remote-care eligibility, provisions a bounded session and records secure participant join and session outcome.
  2. Failure recovery and clinical handoff would preserve appointment and encounter ownership rather than placing them with the video provider.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include appointment eligibility, participant identity or representation, secure join, session purpose and prescription policy.
  • A provider session would not by itself establish attendance, a clinical encounter or a prescription.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes provisioning, participant assurance, join, leave, failure and recovery history.
  • Session-to-appointment and session-to-clinical-record handoffs would retain correlation and owner acknowledgement.
Connected product areas
Scheduling
Scheduling would retain remote appointment and commitment state.
ClinicalCare / future Telehealth
Ownership of the teleconsult record versus session mechanics remains unresolved.
Video and communication providers
No video or communication provider has been selected or connected.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Telehealth.
  • Decisions are still open on ownership of the consultation record, video provider, patient and clinician experiences, prescribing policy and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no telehealth team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future Telehealth owner may own remote-session mechanics; appointment and clinical-record ownership remain separate and unresolved.

Who this supports
  • Patients
  • Clinicians
  • Scheduling teams
Technical ownership evidence

Soon · Longer-term product area

Patient application & portal

Intended team surfaces

Patient app · Operate

An intended patient-facing application for purpose-limited appointments, payments, reports, prescriptions and communication.

PatientsAuthorised representativesPatient-service teams
18 brief points
What teams can do
  • Patient account and representative access
  • Appointment viewing and management
  • Billing, payment and receipt access
  • Protected report and document download
  • Prescription and care-instruction visibility
  • Communication preferences and notifications
  • Privacy-aware family and delegation controls
How work moves
  1. Intended scope would assure a patient or representative, resolve a purpose-limited relationship and present bounded owner data.
  2. Appointment, payment, report and communication actions would call their source owners and display confirmed outcomes.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include patient-account assurance, representative authority, purpose, privacy restrictions and protected recovery.
  • The application would not copy owner ledgers into a second patient, billing or clinical source of truth.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes account assurance, representative relationship, recovery and access history.
  • Owner handoffs, protected downloads, payments and preference changes would retain source acknowledgement.
Connected product areas
Patients and Identity
Patient identity, account identity and representative assurance would remain separate governed owners.
Scheduling, PatientBilling, ClinicalCare and Notifications
The application would present and submit bounded commands while each service retains its own record.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for the Patient application and portal.
  • Decisions are still open on account design, representative access, where the experience will be available, which product areas supply each action, public release and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Patient applicationOperations

    A separate patient-facing experience is intended, but it is not available today.

Where responsibility changes

A future patient application would present purpose-limited owner data; it would not become another patient registry, financial ledger or clinical record.

Who this supports
  • Patients
  • Authorised representatives
  • Patient-service teams
Technical ownership evidence

Recorded owner: Roadmap product domain

Related atlas domains

Soon · Longer-term product area

Emergency & triage workspace

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended time-critical workspace composing registration, triage, resuscitation and disposition across existing owners.

Emergency teamsFront deskCritical-care operators
19 brief points
What teams can do
  • Rapid and provisional registration
  • Triage category, reassessment and deterioration tracking
  • Emergency encounter and care-team coordination
  • Trauma and resuscitation documentation
  • Observation and critical-care transition
  • Constrained emergency-access acknowledgement
  • Admission, discharge and transfer handoff
How work moves
  1. Intended scope would move a rapid or provisional registration through triage, reassessment, emergency care and explicit disposition.
  2. Admission, discharge, transfer or critical-care transition would hand state to existing owners rather than creating another inpatient stay record.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include time-critical identity handling, triage reassessment, deterioration escalation and explicit clinical author context.
  • Emergency access would have to use the existing constrained policy limited to patient read and urgent-note creation; no universal break-glass is proposed.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes triage category, reassessment, deterioration, trauma, resuscitation and disposition chronology.
  • Emergency-access acknowledgement and owner handoffs would retain actor, purpose, expiry and review state.
Connected product areas
Patients and ClinicalCare
Patients would retain identity and ClinicalCare would retain encounter and clinical facts.
Scheduling and Inpatient
Arrival, queue and disposition would cross explicit scheduling and ADT boundaries.
Permissions
Any emergency access would remain limited, expiring and reviewable under current permission definitions.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Emergency and triage.
  • Decisions are still open on ownership, the triage model, where teams would work, clinical forms, the critical-care boundary and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no emergency or triage team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future workspace would compose existing patient, scheduling, clinical and inpatient owners; it would not create another source of truth.

Who this supports
  • Emergency teams
  • Front desk
  • Critical-care operators
Technical ownership evidence

Soon · Longer-term product area

Surgery & operating theatre

Intended team surfaces

Foundation · Foundation

An intended capability-gated perioperative workspace from procedure request and readiness through theatre, recovery and disposition.

Surgical teamsTheatre coordinatorsHospital administrators
19 brief points
What teams can do
  • Procedure request and surgical decision
  • Pre-operative assessment and readiness
  • Theatre list, room and team coordination
  • Safety checklist and pause-state handling
  • Anaesthesia and intra-operative record
  • Specimen and implant traceability
  • Recovery, post-operative orders and disposition
How work moves
  1. Intended scope would move a procedure request through decision, readiness, theatre coordination, safety pause, operation and recovery.
  2. Specimen, implant, post-operative order and disposition handoffs would retain their clinical, diagnostic, stock and inpatient owners.
Safeguards
  • Intended controls include procedure authority, readiness criteria, team and room assignment, checklist state, pause handling and clinical authorship.
  • Implant and specimen traceability would require explicit owner handoffs; no future stock or laboratory contract is selected.
What stays reviewable
  • Intended evidence includes request, decision, readiness, theatre list, team, checklist, anaesthesia, intra-operative and recovery chronology.
  • Specimen, implant, post-operative order and disposition acknowledgements would retain source-owner correlation.
Connected product areas
ClinicalCare and Scheduling
ClinicalCare would retain clinical facts and Scheduling would retain theatre commitments; final workspace ownership is not approved.
Facilities, Inpatient and future Inventory
Rooms, disposition and implant stock would remain with their owners through explicit handoffs.
Future Laboratory
Specimen custody would require an approved diagnostic boundary that does not yet exist.
Availability
  • No delivery programme has been approved for Surgery and operating theatre.
  • Decisions are still open on ownership, where teams would work, the anaesthesia record, theatre resources, stock handoffs and delivery timing.
Intended team surfaces

Proposed team setting only. It does not mean that the team experience is available today.

  • Platform foundationFoundation only

    Longer-term direction only; no surgery or operating-theatre team experience has been approved.

Where responsibility changes

A future perioperative workspace would compose encounter and scheduling owners; it would not create another patient record, stock ledger or diagnostic owner.

Who this supports
  • Surgical teams
  • Theatre coordinators
  • Hospital administrators
Technical ownership evidence

Responsibility atlas

Follow the record, decision and handoff.

The atlas shows where hospital work is accountable and where responsibility changes. It prevents a shared platform from becoming a shared source of truth.

Wing 01 · 11 domains

Clinical continuum

The patient story stays coherent while each clinical lifecycle keeps a clear owner.

Care Coordination & Case Management

Complex cases, transitions and discharge barriers coordinated across settings.

Responsibility

Cross-setting coordination, utilisation review, transitions of care, discharge barriers and multidisciplinary plans.

Where it hands off

Owns coordination and barriers; diagnoses and clinical findings stay in clinical records.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Clinical Coordination

Illustrative coordination vocabularyCaseOpenedDischargeBarrierRaisedTransitionPlanCompleted

Clinical Care & EMR

The encounter-centred clinical record and the decisions made inside it.

Responsibility

History, examination, diagnoses, problems, notes, orders, medication intent, referrals, follow-up and care plans.

Where it hands off

Owns the encounter record; diagnostic services own execution and verified results.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Core Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyEncounterStartedDiagnosisRecordedClinicalOrderPlacedEncounterCompleted

Inpatient ADT & Bed Operations

Admission, stays, bed occupancy, transfer, leave, discharge, census and mortuary custody as explicit operational lifecycles.

Responsibility

Admission requests and decisions, stays, bed holds and occupancy, transfers, leave and return, discharge, census reconciliation and mortuary custody.

Where it hands off

Owns ADT and physical disposition; Facilities owns bed structure, while ClinicalCare owns nursing and clinical documentation, treatment and medication-administration facts.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Core Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyAdmissionStartedBedOccupancyChangedCensusReconciledMortuaryCustodyTransferred

Emergency & Critical Care

Time-critical registration, triage, resuscitation and disposition.

Responsibility

Emergency registration, triage, trauma, resuscitation, observation, rapid response and ICU/HDU workflows.

Where it hands off

Owns emergency and critical-care state, not laboratory or imaging execution.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Core Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyEmergencyEncounterStartedTriageCompletedCriticalCareAdmitted

Surgery & Perioperative

The surgical lifecycle from request and readiness through recovery.

Responsibility

Procedure requests, pre-op, theatre scheduling, anaesthesia, safety checks, intra-op record, specimens and recovery.

Where it hands off

Owns surgical state; inventory owns stock and blood bank owns blood products.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Core Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularySurgeryRequestedTheatreConfirmedSurgeryCompleted

Women’s Health, Maternity & Newborn

A continuous pregnancy, labour, delivery and mother-newborn journey.

Responsibility

Gynaecology pathways, pregnancy episodes, antenatal care, labour, delivery, postnatal care and mother-newborn linkage.

Where it hands off

Owns pregnancy and delivery lifecycle; inpatient owns bed state.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyPregnancyEpisodeStartedLabourStartedDeliveryRecordedNewbornLinked

Paediatrics

Child-specific clinical context, growth and guardian-aware care.

Responsibility

Paediatric workflows, growth and development, guardian-aware care, safety and immunisation coordination.

Where it hands off

Owns child-specific care context; the patient registry owns identity.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyPaediatricAssessmentRecordedGrowthAssessmentRecorded

Oncology

Longitudinal cancer care from registry and staging through survivorship.

Responsibility

Cancer registry, staging, tumour board, treatment plans, chemotherapy cycles, toxicity monitoring and survivorship.

Where it hands off

Owns cancer treatment lifecycle; pharmacy dispenses and diagnostics own results.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyCancerStagedTreatmentCycleStartedTreatmentCycleCompleted

Renal & Dialysis

Recurring dialysis programmes with prescription, station and access tracking.

Responsibility

Renal programmes and dialysis lifecycle, including prescription, allocation, session monitoring and access tracking.

Where it hands off

Owns dialysis programme and session; scheduling may own slot reservation.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyDialysisSessionScheduledDialysisSessionCompleted

Fertility & IVF

Identity-controlled treatment cycles, embryology and cryostorage.

Responsibility

Fertility cycles, gamete handling, embryology, witnessing, transfer, cryostorage and donor workflows.

Where it hands off

Owns cycle, embryology and cryostorage lifecycle with strict identity controls.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyIVFCycleStartedEmbryoStoredEmbryoTransferred

Rehabilitation & Allied Care

Therapy plans, repeated sessions and measurable functional outcomes.

Responsibility

Physiotherapy, occupational therapy, rehabilitation, functional outcomes, nutrition and dietetics programmes.

Where it hands off

Owns therapy and nutrition plans; facility kitchens own food production.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Advanced Clinical

Illustrative coordination vocabularyTherapyPlanCreatedTherapySessionCompletedNutritionPlanUpdated

Wing 02 · 4 domains

Diagnostics and medication

Diagnostic execution and medication safety remain traceable without taking ownership from the clinician.

Laboratory & Pathology

A specimen-to-result lifecycle with verification and critical-value escalation.

Responsibility

Lab orders, specimen lifecycle, processing, results, verification, pathology disciplines, QC and instrument integration.

Where it hands off

Owns specimens and verified results; the ordering domain owns clinical intent.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Diagnostics

Illustrative coordination vocabularySpecimenCollectedSpecimenRejectedLabResultVerified
Laboratory scope detail

Delivery patterns are source-backed facility models. Specialties and functions are architecture-scoping examples for discovery—not proof that each capability is delivered.

Delivery models

Source-backed facility planning patterns

  • In-house laboratory
  • External referral laboratory
  • Hybrid laboratory

Specialty examples

Architecture scoping examples

  • Hematology
  • Clinical chemistry
  • Microbiology
  • Histopathology
  • Cytology
  • Immunology & serology
  • Molecular diagnostics

Functional scope

Architecture scoping examples

  • Order intake & accessioning
  • Specimen collection & tracking
  • Processing & worklists
  • Result verification
  • Critical-value escalation
  • Quality control
  • Analyzer & instrument integration
  • Referral handoff & result return

Radiology & Imaging

Imaging safety, acquisition, reporting and critical findings in one lifecycle.

Responsibility

Imaging orders, scheduling, modality workflow, contrast checks, reporting, critical findings and PACS/VNA integration.

Where it hands off

Owns the imaging study and report lifecycle.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Diagnostics

Illustrative coordination vocabularyImagingStudyStartedImagingReportVerified

Blood Bank & Transfusion

Donor and blood-component traceability from reservation to bedside.

Responsibility

Donor and component lifecycle, inventory, grouping, compatibility, cross-match, issue and transfusion reactions.

Where it hands off

Owns blood inventory, compatibility and issue.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Diagnostics / Therapeutics

Illustrative coordination vocabularyBloodReservedBloodIssuedTransfusionReactionReported

Pharmacy & Medication

Formulary, pharmacist review, dispensing, reconciliation and medication safety.

Responsibility

Medication catalogue, pharmacist review, dispensing, inpatient and OPD pharmacy, controlled drugs and reconciliation.

Where it hands off

Owns pharmacy rules and dispense; the prescriber owns medication intent.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Medication

Illustrative coordination vocabularyMedicationVerifiedMedicationDispensedMedicationReturned

Wing 03 · 3 domains

Revenue cycle

Operational patient accounts, payer lifecycles and accounting books are separated so every number has a trustworthy source.

Billing & Revenue

The operational patient account, from estimate through payment.

Responsibility

Pricing, estimates, charge capture, invoices, packages, deposits, payments, discounts, refunds and cashier work.

Where it hands off

Owns patient charges and payments; no hospital general-ledger accounting owner is claimed in the current service portfolio.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Revenue Cycle

Illustrative coordination vocabularyChargePostedInvoiceFinalizedPaymentReceivedRefundCompleted

Insurance & Claims

Coverage and payer work from eligibility to final settlement.

Responsibility

Coverage, eligibility, pre-authorisation, cashless workflow, claims, queries, denials, appeals and settlement.

Where it hands off

Owns the payer lifecycle; billing owns the patient invoice.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Revenue Cycle

Illustrative coordination vocabularyEligibilityVerifiedPreAuthorizationApprovedClaimSubmittedClaimSettled

Tenant Commercial Billing

HMS products, subscriptions and organisation-level billing remain separate from patient finance.

Responsibility

Sellers, products, prices, tenant billing accounts, subscriptions, invoices, payments, credits, refunds, dunning and provider reconciliation.

Where it hands off

Charges tenant organisations for HMS; PatientBilling owns patient money, future Insurance owns payer claims and no general-ledger accounting is claimed.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Commercial

Illustrative coordination vocabularyCommercialSubscriptionChangedTenantInvoiceIssuedCommercialPaymentReconciled

Wing 04 · 7 domains

Hospital operations

Facility structure, resources, stock, workforce and standards become explicit operating domains rather than shared spreadsheets.

Tenant & Facility Context

Tenant scope and facility structure stay distinct while operational services consume bounded context.

Responsibility

Tenant owns organisation lifecycle, profile and initial ownership; Facilities owns facility relationships, physical hierarchy, services, schedules, equipment, partners and readiness.

Where it hands off

Identity owns organisation units and memberships; Scheduling owns reservations; Inpatient owns bed occupancy and patient-location history.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyTenantActivatedFacilityConfiguredFacilityContextSelected

Scheduling, Resource & Queue

Booked slots, walk-ins, waitlists and resources resolved in one operating queue.

Responsibility

Provider schedules, appointment slots, appointments, waitlists, walk-ins, tokens, queues and schedulable resources.

Where it hands off

Owns reservations and queues, never the clinical encounter opened from them.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyAppointmentBookedAppointmentCheckedInQueueTokenCalled

Inventory & Procurement

Stock, batches, expiry and procurement with traceable movement.

Responsibility

Items, stores, batches, expiry, stock movement, procurement, vendors, receipts, transfers, recalls and counts.

Where it hands off

Owns the stock ledger; clinical domains own the reason an item is consumed.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Supply Chain

Illustrative coordination vocabularyStockReservedStockIssuedPurchaseOrderApprovedRecallInitiated

Governance, Quality & Compliance

Organisational quality, safety and improvement work retain accountable owners and review evidence.

Responsibility

Quality and accreditation support, organisational incidents, patient safety, infection control, CAPA and general policy governance.

Where it hands off

Does not own ConsentAuthority instruments, Privacy rights cases, immutable audit evidence or source-service transaction records.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Enterprise

Illustrative coordination vocabularyOrganisationalIncidentReportedCAPAOpenedPolicyPublished

Facility Operations

The physical hospital: equipment, maintenance, hospitality and support services.

Responsibility

Biomedical equipment, maintenance, calibration, housekeeping, laundry, dietary, ambulance, security, CSSD and waste.

Where it hands off

Owns physical operational workflows and asset readiness.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Enterprise

Illustrative coordination vocabularyBedCleaningCompletedEquipmentOutOfServiceAmbulanceDispatched

Patient Engagement & CRM

Patient-facing access, enquiries, feedback and communication preference.

Responsibility

Portal and mobile experience, enquiries, CRM, referral tracking, campaigns, feedback, loyalty and family access.

Where it hands off

Owns engagement state; the clinical record remains with clinical domains.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Experience

Illustrative coordination vocabularyPatientFeedbackReceivedCommunicationPreferenceChanged

Wing 05 · 10 domains

Platform foundation

Shared capabilities connect the system without becoming a shared database or a place where domain ownership disappears.

Identity & Access

Authentication, account assurance and fail-closed authorization stay separate while every action carries explicit scope.

Responsibility

Auth owns OAuth2/OIDC authorization-server and token issuance; Identity owns accounts, memberships, roles, sessions, MFA, passkeys, invitations and login risk; Permissions owns authorization, delegation, entitlements and effective-access decisions.

Where it hands off

Separates authentication and account lifecycle from authorization; none of these owners owns tenant, employment or patient clinical records.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyTokenIssuedSessionRevokedAccessDecisionEvaluated

Patient Registry / MPI

A tenant-scoped patient identity, reconciled across the places care begins within that hospital context.

Responsibility

Demographics, identifiers, duplicate detection, correction, merge, unmerge and identity reconstruction within one tenant.

Where it hands off

Owns patient identity, not a cross-tenant MPI, encounters, invoices, observations or clinical notes.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyPatientRegisteredPatientMergedPatientIdentityUpdated

Provider Directory & Credentialing

Clinical identity, credentials, privileges and affiliations in one authority.

Responsibility

Practitioners, roles, specialties, qualifications, licences, privileges and facility affiliations.

Where it hands off

Owns clinical privilege and affiliation; employment and payroll remain outside current Provider ownership, and no HR/Payroll service family is claimed.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyPractitionerCredentialChangedPrivilegeGrantedProviderAffiliationChanged

Workflow Orchestration

Durable coordination for the small set of named service processes enabled at runtime.

Responsibility

Coordination for tenant initial-owner onboarding, terminology-source onboarding and consent-policy review when their exact workflow registrations are enabled.

Where it hands off

Coordinates service-owned commands and terminal state; it is not a user-authored automation surface, clinical pathway owner or business record.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyOnboardingCompletionSignalledTerminologySourceOnboardingStartedConsentPolicyReviewRequested

Notification & Communication

Template-driven delivery, escalation and retry across approved channels.

Responsibility

Email, approved messaging, push, reminders, escalation delivery, templates, delivery status and retries.

Where it hands off

Owns message delivery, never the business decision to notify.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform

Illustrative coordination vocabularyNotificationQueuedNotificationDeliveredNotificationFailed

Privacy & Data Rights

Patient data-rights cases, restrictions and protected disclosure evidence coordinate bounded owner action.

Responsibility

Rights-request intake and queues, case categories and decisions, owner coordination, protected packages, disclosure evidence, restrictions, legal holds and subject reconciliation.

Where it hands off

Coordinates and evidences allowed disposition; source services execute changes, Patients owns identity and ConsentAuthority owns consent instruments.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Governance

Illustrative coordination vocabularyDataRightsRequestOpenedPrivacyRestrictionAppliedDisclosurePackagePublished

Integration & Interoperability

FHIR, HL7, DICOM and partner boundaries without leaking domain decisions.

Responsibility

External-system adapters, devices, government, payer, payment and partner connectivity.

Where it hands off

Owns translation and routing; domain decisions remain with domain owners.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform

Illustrative coordination vocabularyExternalMessageReceivedExternalMessageFailed

Reporting & Analytics

Operational and executive views built from projections, not shared write tables.

Responsibility

Dashboards, analytical read models, warehouse feeds, KPIs, scheduled reports and BI integration.

Where it hands off

Owns analytical projections, never transactional truth.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform

Illustrative coordination vocabularyAnalyticsProjectionUpdatedReportGenerated

Audit & Security Events

A durable history that can reconstruct access, change and privileged action.

Responsibility

Append-oriented audit and security-event ingestion, access history, privileged-action history and compliance retrieval.

Where it hands off

Owns audit history and retrieval, not operational application logs.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform

Illustrative coordination vocabularyAuditEventRecordedPrivilegedActionRecorded

Clinical Terminology & Master Data

Versioned vocabulary, value sets and governed shared masters.

Responsibility

Clinical terminologies, code systems, value sets, service masters, mappings and versioning.

Where it hands off

Owns controlled vocabulary; domains reference governed codes and versions.

Technical ownership evidence

Source grouping: Platform / Foundation

Illustrative coordination vocabularyTerminologyVersionPublishedMasterDataChanged

From atlas to rollout

Bring your facility footprint, team responsibilities and connected-system questions. The written scope—not this catalog—defines what a rollout includes.

Map HMS to the way your hospital actually works.